Led by the National Oceanography Centre Southampton, the consortium involved 11 UK partners. The consortium will ran for four years from October 2012 and involved sea and land-based fieldwork, modelling studies and societal cost estimates.

Deliverables were supplied to the UK flood-risk management (Environment Agency, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Scottish Environment Protection Agency), the re-insurance sector (Willis Research Network) and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.

Aim

The specific aims of the research project were:

  1. to determine the frequency and timing of major Arctic submarine slides;
  2. to better understand trigger factors and assess whether the frequency of the slides is likely to increase as climate changes and oceans warm;
  3. to assess the magnitude necessary for landslide-tsunamis to flood parts of the UK coast
  4. to quantify the likely cost to the UK of different types of inundation triggered by different types of landslide occurring in different locations.

The project used a range of techniques, including shipboard expeditions that mapped the Arctic seafloor and extract sediment cores from the seabed, fieldwork on land to identify and date coastal tsunami deposits, slope stability modelling, laboratory experiments showing how hydrate dissociation affects sediment strength, and modelling of future trends in seismicity. Also included is modelling of landslide motion, tsunami wave generation and propagation, and how tsunami waves would interact with existing UK coastal defence structures. Based on these results recommendations on measures that can be taken to offset a tsunami's impact on the UK coast can be given.Finally, a sensitivity analysis aima to capture uncertainties, and determine societal cost.

The science team worked closely with stakeholders, including government bodies (the Scottish Government and Defra, the Environment Agency) and the reinsurance sector.

National Oceanography Centre

Dr Peter Talling

Dr James Hunt

Dr Kevin Horsburgh

Dr Russell Wynn

Prof. Douglas Masson


British Geological Survey

Dr David Long

Prof. David Tappin

Dr Roger Musson

Dr Brian Baptie


University of Aberdeen

Dr Alastair Dawson


University of Dundee

Dr Sue Dawson

Dr Pedro Costa


University of Cambridge

Dr Julian Dowdeswell


University of Ulster

Prof. John McCloskey

Dr Suleyman Nalbant

Dr Paul Dunlop


University of Southampton

Dr Antonis Zervos

Dr Jeff Priest

Prof. Chris Clayton


University of Exeter

Prof. Peter Challenor


Imperial College

Dr Matthew Piggott

Dr Jon Hill

Dr Gareth Collins

Dr Peter Allison

Prof. Walter Distaso


University of Manchester

Prof. Peter Stansby

Dr Benedict Rogers

Dr Lee Cunningham

Outcomes:

Submarine landslaides can generate potentially very damaging and widespread tsunami. For example, the Storegga Slide that occurred 8,200 years ago offshore Norway is larger than Scotland. It produce a major tsunami that ran up to heights of up to 20m around surrounding coasts. A repeat of this scale of landslide-tsunami is one of the most damaging natural events that could impact the UK.

A first important result of our study is that an even larger landslide has been found below the Storegga Slide. This older event occurred at 55-60,000 years ago. Therefore, megalsides in this area have recurrence intervals of less than 100,000 years. This is important because events with recurrence intervals of less than 100,000 years should be considered on the UK National Risk Register, and in the design of nuclear power stations.

A second key result originates from dating the Traenadjupet and Nyk Slides located further along the Norwegian Margin, to the north of the Storegga Slide. It was previously thought that we would need another glacial advance to the shelf edge, to dump more sediment, and thereby cause a new landslide. However, our work on the Traenadjupet and Nyk Slides shows that they occurred within 15,000 years, without another ice stream advance. This shows that we do not need another ice stream advance to cause another large submarine slide from the same source area.

Finally, we show that the Traenadjupet Slide did not create a major tsunami along the nearest coastlines. This suggests that not all very large submarine slides are strongly tsunamigenic.

Landslide tsunami consortium